Re: Why did the West intervene in Bosnia and Kosovo?

Posted by N. Saed on December 28, 2002 at 06:07:30:

In Reply to: Why did the West intervene in Bosnia and Kosovo? posted by John on December 23, 2002 at 15:02:38:

Dear
I belive that you are all in wet. Forceful intervention in a State, is contradictiort to internationsl law. never any state could be attacked ad or intervened in the light of humanitarian reasons and other ambigiuos and politically bases. Maintenance of the international peace and security in the international community in its present situation required all states to obey the law.
Therefor, I belive that, as many scholars have said, any intervention not permitted by the Clear resolution of Security Council in accordance with the VII Cahpter of the Charter, will be a serious violation of the international law.
In any case, intervention of the NATO and other states in the Cosovo Crisis had been violated the art.(4)2 of the Carter.
Second, analysis of any international problem in the light of a ideological thoughts without considering the international law, is not true and fairely work. Salouthering of any civilians (muslims or others), Will not be protectable.
I will be waited to your legal viewpoints on this case.
Thanks a lot.
N. Saed

Responses:

© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law
All comments and suggestions should be sent to webmaster
This site is part of the Academy of European Law online, a joint partnership of the Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law and the Academy of European Law at the European University Institute.
This file was last modified: Monday, May 05, 2003 12:01PM