 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Re: Why did the West intervene in Bosnia and Kosovo?
Posted by John on December 29, 2002 at 06:24:19:
In Reply to: Re: Why did the West intervene in Bosnia and Kosovo? posted by N. Saed on December 28, 2002 at 06:07:30:
: Dear
I DON'T KNOW MUCH ABOUT INTERNATIONAL LAW UNFORTUNATELY. WHAT
I WANT TO SAY IS THE WEST INTERVENED TO THOSE CONFLICTS NOT TO PREVENT MAINLY
MUSLIM CIVILIANS BEING KILLED BY THE CHRISTIAN SERBS. IF THE CHRISTIANS WERE
BEING KILLED BY THE MUSLIMS WOULD THEY WAIT SO LONG FOR THREE YEARS? JUST AS IN
CYPRUS WHERE MUSLIM TURKISH CYPRIOTS WERE KILLED BY GREEK EOKA TERRORISTS WHILE
UN AND THE WEST JUST SAT AND WATCHED FOR YEARS AND YEARS.. FINALLY TURKISH ARMY
HAD TO STOP THE KILLINGS. IN ALL OVER THE WORLD ESPECIALLY IN MUSLIM LANDS
KILLING OF INNOCENT CIVILIANS, OTHER HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS CONTINUE.
CHECHNYA, KASHMIR eg. I THINK IN THE MINDS OF WESTERNERS MUSLIMS CAN BE WASTED,
THEIR RIGHTS CAN BE IGNORED. THATS WHY THEY SAY NOTHING ON THE ONGOING
SLAUGHTER OF CHECHENS.. WHAT I WANT TO SAY IS WE ARE LIVING IN CLASH BETWEEN
CIVILIZATIONS. RELIGION IS THE REASON OF MAJOR WARS IN THE WORLD.
© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law
All comments and suggestions should be sent to webmaster
This site is part
of the Academy of European Law online, a joint partnership of the Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law and the Academy of European
Law at the European University
Institute.
This file was last modified:
Monday, May 05, 2003 12:00PM