 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Interrvention
Posted by Mark Richardson on December 23, 2001 at 15:20:04:
The concept of intervention was clearly changing over the long-term
prior to attacks, with growing exceptions to the basic rule of national
sovereignty, but to what extent can it be said there is a right to intervene in
a state which is home to terrorists? While this may depend on factors such as
UNSC backing and actual terrorist acts against other states, this seems
difficult to reconcile with established international law.
Is this the
emergence of a new norm?
Surely some clearer sign of UN approval will be
necessary (as opposed to the resolutions)?
© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law
All comments and suggestions should be sent to webmaster
This site is part
of the Academy of European Law online, a joint partnership of the Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law and the Academy of European
Law at the European University
Institute.
This file was last modified:
Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:23AM