 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Re: usurpation of rights act
Posted by Angel Ramos Medina on January 21, 2002 at 21:27:46:
In Reply to: usurpation of rights act posted by masood ahmed on November 01, 2001 at 07:57:03:
: united states remained champion of individual rights and U S constitution is the pioneer in this regard. But now the patriotic act has shattered the image of U S on the mere pretext of terrorist threat and the congress passed the draconian law, through which the sanctity of rights will be infringed upon the mere suspicion.--- I could not agree more. I am against it. There are other means of attaining the same objectives.
© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law
All comments and suggestions should be sent to webmaster
This site is part
of the Academy of European Law online, a joint partnership of the Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law and the Academy of European
Law at the European University
Institute.
This file was last modified:
Monday, May 05, 2003 12:23PM