Can a State Commit a Crime? Definitely, Yes! Alain Pellet* Full text available: PDF format ** Abstract Despite the strong (probably growing) and passionate campaign against the notion of state crimes led by a handful of powerful states and relayed by some ILC members, including the new Special Rapporteur, the distinction between what is termed `delicts' and what is termed `crimes' answers an indisputable need and must be maintained. However, while the definition of crimes given in Article 19 of the ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility is acceptable, though perhaps unduly sophisticated, the legal regime of these crimes as envisaged by the ILC is debatable. The method adopted to establish this regime has been grossly unsatisfactory and it must be accepted that the word `crime' might be misleading. The concept is nevertheless indispensable in contemporary international law. * University of Paris X-Nanterre and Institute of Political Studies, Paris; Member of the International Law Commission. ** The free viewer (Acrobat Reader) for PDF file is available at the Adobe Systems.
	© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law All comments and suggestions should be sent to webmaster This site is part of the Academy of European Law online, a joint partnership of the Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law and the Academy of European Law at the European University Institute. This file was last modified: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 02:13AM