
|
|

The Security
Council, the International Court and Judicial Review: What Lessons from
Lockerbie?
Bernd Martenczuk*
Full text available:
PDF format **
Abstract
Unlike any previous case, the Lockerbie cases have raised questions
about the nature and extent of the Security Council's powers under Chapter VII
of the UN Charter. Due to the recent surrender of the suspects in the 1988
Lockerbie bombing, the International Court of Justice may no longer be in a
position to pronounce itself on the validity of the resolutions adopted by the
Council in this matter. However, the question of whether Security Council
resolutions can be subjected to judicial review by the Court remains of crucial
importance for the constitutional system of the United Nations. The article
reviews the Court's orders and judgments in the Lockerbie cases and assesses
the circumstances under which judicial review might occur in the context of the
UN system. The article then turns to the substantive questions left unanswered
by the Court, focusing on three main issues: the binding nature of the UN
Charter for the Council; the nature and extent of the Council's power of
determination under Article 39 of the Charter; and the Council's position with
respect to general international law. Overall, the article proposes a textual
approach to Article 39, the wording of which contains all the necessary
elements for a workable delimitation of the Council's powers.

* Dr. jur., University of Frankfurt am Main, 1996; Master
of Public Administration, Harvard University, 1995. The author is presently a
research fellow at the Institute of Public Law, University of Frankfurt am
Main, Germany.
** The free viewer (Acrobat Reader) for PDF file is
available at the
Adobe Systems.

|
|
© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law
All comments and suggestions should be sent to webmaster
This site is part
of the Academy of European Law online, a joint partnership of the Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law and the Academy of European
Law at the European University
Institute.
This file was last modified:
Tuesday, October 14, 2003 01:22PM
|