Unilateral Action and the Transformations of the World Constitutive Process: The Special Problem of Humanitarian Intervention Michael Reisman Full text available: PDF format * Abstract `Unilateral actions' are taken by an unauthorized participant who contends they are, nonetheless, lawful. The lawfulness of such actions must be examined as a constitutive question before one proceeds to determine whether a particular action fulfilled the substantive criteria of lawfulness. As a constitutive matter, lawfulness is a function of constitutive structure. In coarchical systems without hierarchical institutions, unilateral action is perforce the mode of decision. In constitutive structures that include generally or intermittently ineffective hierarchical institutions, the lawfulness of unilateral action is more complex and unilateral action becomes normatively ambiguous as a result of the cognitive dissonance caused by the decalage between substantive lawfulness and procedural unlawfulness. In constitutive structures that incorporate effective decision institutions, unilateral action is presumptively unlawful. The normative ambiguity of unilateral actions in contemporary international law arises from the regrettable but acknowledged intermittent ineffectiveness of decision institutions. The appropriate remedy for this problem is to make the institutions effective, thereby obviating the problem. * The free viewer (Acrobat Reader) for PDF file is available at the Adobe Systems.
	© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law All comments and suggestions should be sent to webmaster This site is part of the Academy of European Law online, a joint partnership of the Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law and the Academy of European Law at the European University Institute. This file was last modified: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 01:36PM