![]()
|
The Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines, the Role of International Non-Governmental Organizations and the Idea of International Civil SocietyKenneth Anderson* Full text available: PDF format ** AbstractEstablishment of the Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines was regarded by many international law scholars, international activists, diplomats and international organization personnel as a defining, `democratizing' change in the way international law is made. By bringing international NGOs - what is often called `international civil society' - into the diplomatic and international law-making process, many believe that the Ottawa Convention represented both a democratization of, and a new source of legitimacy for, international law, in part because it was presumably made `from below'. This article sharply questions whether the Ottawa Convention and the process leading up to it represents any real `democratization' of international law, challenges the idea that there is even such a thing as `international civil society', at least in the sense that it is democratic and comes `from below', and disputes that there can be such a thing as `democratic' processes at the global level. It suggests, by way of alternative, that the Ottawa Convention and the process leading up to it should be seen as a step in the development of global transnational elites at the expense of genuinely democratic, but hence local, processes.
|
|
|
© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law | ||