Minding the Gap: Outlining KFOR Accountability in Post-Conflict Kosovo John Cerone Full text available: PDF format * Abstract Notwithstanding the unique conditions of its deployment, KFOR does not act in a legal vacuum. As an entity deployed under UN auspices and by virtue of its exercise of public authority in Kosovo, it is bound by provisions of international human rights and humanitarian law to the extent of its control over individuals there. There are at least three different modalities through which international human rights law may apply to the conduct of KFOR soldiers in Kosovo: the mandate of Resolution 1244; the human rights obligations of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia; and the human rights obligations of the governments of the national contingents of KFOR. All of the national governments of the various KFOR contingents are bound by the Geneva Conventions, which form the core of modern humanitarian law. As Kosovo may be considered occupied territory, the humanitarian law of occupation is applicable. Further, the failure of KFOR troops to meet international standards for the treatment of individuals may give rise to individual state accountability. Finally, should KFOR or its participating states choose to declare a derogation, they would remain bound by the minimum standards provided by humanitarian law. * The free viewer (Acrobat Reader) for PDF file is available at the Adobe Systems.
	© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law All comments and suggestions should be sent to webmaster This site is part of the Academy of European Law online, a joint partnership of the Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law and the Academy of European Law at the European University Institute. This file was last modified: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 09:16AM