The ICTY's Prosecutor and the Review of the NATO Bombing Campaign against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Paolo Benvenuti Full text available: PDF format * Abstract The author analyses the report on the NATO bombing campaign against Yugoslavia, prepared by the Review Committee created by the ICTY's Prosecutor, and observes that the recommendation that no investigation be commenced because `either the law is not sufficiently clear or investigations are unlikely to result in the acquisition of sufficient evidence' appears prima facie questionable. The author points out the shortcomings of the Committee's `Work Program' arising from the unbalanced evidence on which Committee's statements are founded and by the restriction of the collateral damages of the campaign to the civilian casualties. Moreover, the Committee's assessment of general issues (damage to environment, legality of weapons, target selection, proportionality) shows a poor grasp of legal concepts, and deviates from well-established ICTY's case law. The Committee's assessment of specific incidents is also characterized by shortcomings: inter alia, the report frequently slips from the level of individual criminal responsibility to that of state responsibility. In his conclusion, the author observes that other fora are likely to verify some of the incidents occurring during the bombing campaign. Proceedings have started before the European Court of Human Rights and there are grounds for the European Court to affirm its jurisdiction. * The free viewer (Acrobat Reader) for PDF file is available at the Adobe Systems.
	© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law All comments and suggestions should be sent to webmaster This site is part of the Academy of European Law online, a joint partnership of the Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law and the Academy of European Law at the European University Institute. This file was last modified: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 09:16AM