The Strange Death of Liberal International Theory Christian Reus-Smit * Full text available: PDF format ** Abstract This article contends that the move to recast liberal international relations theory in positivist terms has undermined its status as a political theory, and that attempts to use such a theory as the basis of a liberal international legal theory undermines its proponents' capacity to reason normatively about international change, a crucial quality of a mature international legal theory. Politics, it will be argued, lies at the intersection of instrumental and ethical deliberation and action, an intersection that actors are drawn towards by the imperatives of practical, collective action. The `New Liberalism' in international relations abandons the political in two ways: it expels normative reflection and argument from the realm of legitimate social scientific enquiry; and it embraces a rationalist conception of agency that reduces all political action to strategic interaction. This `positive' theory lacks the philosophical resources to inform the articulation of a mature liberal international legal theory, a theory that coherently mediates between the pragmatics of social and political circumstance, the practice of rule interpretation, and the prescription of new norms. * Senior Fellow, Department of International Relations, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University, Canberra. ** The free viewer (Acrobat Reader) for PDF file is available at the Adobe Systems.
	© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law All comments and suggestions should be sent to webmaster This site is part of the Academy of European Law online, a joint partnership of the Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law and the Academy of European Law at the European University Institute. This file was last modified: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 09:16AM