Home
Current Issue
Developments
Archive
Table of Contents
Surveys
Book Reviews
Discussion Forum
Information
Reading Room
Links of Interest
Search
Join our email list
Translate this page
  

Table of ContentsNext Page

Information Warfare as International Coercion: Elements of a Legal Framework

Christopher C. Joyner * and Catherine Lotrionte **

Full text available: PDF format ***

Abstract

Worldwide interconnectivity through massive computer networks now makes states vulnerable to new threats. Foreign governments can launch computer-based assaults, or acts of information warfare, on another state's domestic systems such as energy grids, telecommunications, and financial facilities that could severely damage or disrupt national defence or vital social services. Even realizing the new forms of computer-generated weapons and changing concepts of sovereignty and territory brought about by global interdependence, international law is likely to rely on UN Charter principles to define the legal boundaries of cyberspace. While perhaps not armed force literally, resort to cyberforce may be viewed as a form of intervention that can produce harmful or coercive effects, and put at risk the national security of another state. There is need for modern international law to define more precisely the criteria used to distinguish which state actions are permissible as normal computer-generated transborder data flow from those cyberactivities that might qualify as an `armed attack' against a state. Clearer rules are also needed for what responses are permissible as self-defence by a state targeted in an information warfare situation and how international institutions might facilitate the attainment of these objectives.

* Professor of International Law, Department of Government, Georgetown University.

** Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, Central Intelligence Agency; Adjunct Professor, National Security Studies Program, Georgetown University.

The authors would like to thank Anthony Clark Arend and Phillip Johnson for assistance and comments made during the preparation of this study. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the position of the United States Government.

*** The free viewer (Acrobat Reader) for PDF file is available at the Adobe Systems.

Table of ContentsNext Page





Top of Page

© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law
All comments and suggestions should be sent to webmaster
This site is part of the Academy of European Law online, a joint partnership of the Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law and the Academy of European Law at the European University Institute.
This file was last modified: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 02:54AM