Home
Current Issue
Developments
Archive
Table of Contents
Surveys
Book Reviews
Discussion Forum
Information
Reading Room
Links of Interest
Search
Join our email list
Translate this page
  

Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page

Time for a United Nations `Global Compact' for Integrating Human Rights into the Law of Worldwide Organizations: Lessons from European Integration

Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann*

Full text available: PDF format **

Discussion Forum


Abstract

The `Global Compact', launched by UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan in 1999, calls upon business to `support and respect the protection of international human rights within their sphere of influence and [to] make sure their own corporations are not complicit in human rights abuses'. This article calls for a complementary `Global Compact' between the UN and UN specialized agencies, as well as with other worldwide public organizations such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), so as to integrate universally recognized human rights into the law and practice of intergovernmental organizations, for example by requiring them to submit annual `human rights impact statements' to UN human rights bodies and to engage in transparent dialogues about the contribution by specialized agencies to the promotion and protection of human rights. The globalization of human rights and of economic integration law offers mutually beneficial synergies: protection and enjoyment of human rights depend also on economic resources and on integration law opening markets, reducing discrimination and enabling a welfare-increasing division of labour. As a corollary, economic, legal and political integration are also a function of human rights protecting personal autonomy, legal and social security, peaceful change, individual savings, investments, production and mutually beneficial transactions across frontiers. The proposed `integration approach' differs from the 1945 paradigm of `specialized agencies' and state-centred international law focusing on the `sovereign equality' of states rather than on human rights and democracy. It takes into account the regional experiences in Europe, that integration law enhances not only economic and social welfare but also the rule of law, the protection of human rights and democratic legitimacy at national and international levels of governance. As in European integration law, human rights should be recognized in global integration law as empowering citizens, as constitutionally limiting national and international regulatory powers, and as requiring governments to protect and promote human rights in all policy areas across national frontiers. Global integration law (e.g. in the WTO) should no longer focus one-sidedly on liberalization. It should also accept shared responsibility for the social adjustment problems of the global division of labour and for governmental obligations to protect and promote human rights in the economy no less than in the polity.

* Professor of International and European Law at the European University Institute and its Robert Schuman Centre in Florence. Former professor at the Universities of St Gallen, Fribourg, Lausanne, Geneva and its Graduate Institute of International Studies, as well as former legal adviser in the German Ministry of Economic Affairs, GATT and the WTO. Chairman of the International Trade Law Committee of the International Law Association.

** The free viewer (Acrobat Reader) for PDF file is available at the Adobe Systems.

Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page





Top of Page

© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law
All comments and suggestions should be sent to webmaster
This site is part of the Academy of European Law online, a joint partnership of the Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law and the Academy of European Law at the European University Institute.
This file was last modified: Sunday, October 06, 2002 09:40PM