The Concept of Suspended Sovereignty in International Law and Its Implications in International Politics Alexandros Yannis* Full text available: PDF format ** Abstract The concept of suspension of sovereignty is not new in the legal and political discourses in international relations. It has been employed mainly to describe dramatic and extreme situations in which a clear rupture is observed between the legal proposition of internal sovereignty and the social and political realities on the ground. A prominent example has been the case of foreign occupation. The recent UN Security Council Resolutions on Kosovo and East Timor rekindled interest in the concept of suspended sovereignty and raised new perspectives about its function and role in international politics because it is the product of legitimate international processes representing a further evolution of models of international political authority. Thus, the possible future crystallization of such a concept in international law should be seen and explored more as an opportunity to increase the transparency and accountability of international transitional administrations and less as a chance to reintroduce hierarchical relations in international politics. * Research Fellow in the Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies (PESI) of the Institut Universitaire de Hautes Etudes Internationales and in the Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy (Eliamep).
	© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law All comments and suggestions should be sent to webmaster This site is part of the Academy of European Law online, a joint partnership of the Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law and the Academy of European Law at the European University Institute. This file was last modified: Friday, August 12, 2005 06:52AM