| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
  |
|
 |
|
  |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Conservative and Progressive Visions in French International Legal Doctrine
Anthony Carty 1
Abstract
How can one develop a progressive agenda of international law, while at the same time not sacrificing the unity and rigour which traditional formalism can appear to claim? In France formalists will not come out of a limited agenda of preservation of the integrity of the French and other classical states, while the progressives, searching for grounds of solidarity in international society, tread uncertainly in the formlessness of material demands made upon the law. Dupuy finds a material basis of unity of the legal order in a triad comprising the general principles of international law, the instrument of the legal fiction and the Kantian theory of the transcendental grounding of the validity of law. Dupuy places the task of developing such a material law in the hands of the international judiciary, despite reservations about their performance. Indeed, it is difficult to imagine any judiciary with the philosophical skill to undertake the tasks he sets them. In fact it is Pierre Legendre, the type of polymath which French culture so readily supports, who demonstrates how problematic is the formalist legal thinking based upon the classical French state. Despite Dupuy’s conciliatory spirit towards his formalist compatriots he has opened a Pandora’s box for them.
1 School of La. University of Westminster.
* The free viewer (Acrobat Reader) for PDF file is available at the Adobe Systems
© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law
All comments and suggestions should be sent to webmaster
This site is part
of the Academy of European Law online, a joint partnership of the Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law and the Academy of European
Law at the European University
Institute.
This file was last modified:
Tuesday, October 17, 2006 05:53AM