Home
Current Issue
Developments
Archive
Table of Contents
Surveys
Book Reviews
Discussion Forum
Information
Reading Room
Links of Interest
Search
Join our email list
Translate this page
  

Germans to the Front? or Le malade imaginaire

Previous Page Table Of ContentsNext Page

II. Military Operations in the UN Context

Four different types of UN operations can be roughly distinguished in which the Bundeswehr could become involved. First, those measures involving the use of armed forces under the command of the Security Council which are envisaged in Chapter VII of the UN Charter but have never thus far been realized.16 Secondly, peace-keeping operations which have generally been accepted as a task of the United Nations despite the lack of an explicit regulation in the Charter.17 However Chapter VI of the UN Charter has been favoured as the legal basis for peace-keeping operations of this kind.18

Thirdly, one possible further scenario for a German participation would be the use of military force based on a mere authorization (with no subsequent supervision) by the Security Council.19 As for now, this scheme of enforcement actions might be the only one that will eventuate as there continues to be no agreements concluded pursuant to Article 43 UN Charter. However, the use of force justified only by Security Council authorization certainly does not fit the ideal programme envisaged by Chapter VII, and has faced serious criticism.20 Finally, most recent developments seem to indicate that peace-keeping operations can now be deployed in the absence of the consent of all parties involved.21

Leaving aside the question as to whether and to what extent the Grundgesetz permits participation in UN military action,22 one should keep in mind that, even if the Grundgesetz excluded the Bundeswehr from all UN initiatives, no violation of international law obligations would occur since UN member states are not obligated to provide their armed forces for UN military operations.23 This is generally recognized for both peace-keeping operations and (in the absence of any agreements pursuant to Article 43 UN Charter)24 the use of military force based on an authorization by the Security Council.25

16 One will recall that Korean War military operations were not executed by the Security Council. The latter merely issued a recommendation that member states should take steps to end the aggression. Cf. UN Doc. No. S/1511 (27 June 1950) and UN Doc. No. S/1588 (7 July 1950).

17 See the landmark opinion of the ICJ: `Certain Expenses of the United Nations, Article 17, paragraph 2, of the Charter, Advisory Opinion', ICJ Reports 1962, 168.

18 For a discussion of the possible legal bases, see Bothe, `Friedenserhaltende Maßnahmen', para. 38ff, in B. Simma (ed.), Charta der Vereinten Nationen. Kommentar (1991) (English edition forthcoming in 1992).

19 The prominent example is SC Res. 678 (29 November 1990) which authorized military actions of the allied forces against Iraq in the Gulf War: `The Security Council ... Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations, ... Authorizes Member States ... to use all necessary means...'.

20 See also infra note 85.

21 SC Res. 687 para. 5 (observer mission to Iraq and Kuwait) and SC Res. 688 and 689 (protection of the Kurds in Iraq) offer problematic examples for such borderline cases of peace-keeping which are based somewhere in the twilight zone between Chapter VI and Chapter VII.
For discussion of these `Chapter VI 1/2 or VI 2/3' operations, see Heinz, Philipp, Wolfrum, `Zweiter Golfkrieg: Anwendungsfall von Kapitel VII der UN-Charta', 39 VN (1991) 128.

22 For the lively political and legal discussion about this question, see inter alia the following references: Blumenwitz, `Der nach außen wirkende Einsatz deutscher Streitkräfte nach Staats- und Völkerrecht', 30 Neue Zeitschrift für Wehrrecht (1988) 133; `Die Einsatzmöglichkeiten deutscher Streitkräfte nach Staats- und Völkerrecht', Zeitbühne (1991) 22; Brunner, `Die internationale Verwendung der Bundeswehr', Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik (ZRP) (1991) 133; Coridaß, Der Auslandseinsatz von Bundeswehr und Nationaler Volksarmee (1985); Fleck, `UN-Friedenstruppen im Brennpunkt, Überlegungen zu einer Beteiligung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland', Vereinte Nationen (VN) (1974) 161; Franke, `Streitkräfte der Vereinten Nationen. Entwicklung und aktuelle Probleme', 18 Archiv des Völkerrechts (AVR) (1979/80) 149; R. Geiger, Grundgesetz und Völkerrecht (1985) 348ff; Giegerich, `The German Contribution to the Protection of Shipping in the Persian Gulf: Staying out for Political or Constitutional Reasons?', 49 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (ZaöRV) (1989) 1, 37ff.; Ipsen, `Commentary on Art. 87a', in Bonner Kommentar zum Grundgesetz (1969); Klein, `Rechtsprobleme einer deutschen Beteiligung an der Aufstellung von Streitkräften der Vereinten Nationen', 34 ZaöRV (1974) 429; Menzel, `Die militärischen Einsätze der Vereinten Nationen zur Sicherung des Friedens', 15 Jahrbuch für internationales Recht (1971) 11; Mössner, `Bundeswehr in blauen Helmen', in v. Münch (ed.), Staatsrecht-Völkerrecht-Europarecht, Festschrift für Schlochauer (1981) 97; Pechstein, `Der Golfkrieg - Völkerrechtliche und grundgesetzliche Aspekte', Jura (1991) 461; Riedel, `Bundeswehr mit "blauen Helmen"', Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) (1989) 639; Scholz, `Deutsche unter blauen Helmen?', Die Neue Ordnung (2/1991) 130; Tomuschat, `Commentary on Art. 24', Bonner Kommentar zum Grundgesetz (1985); Wechmar, `Friedenserhaltende Maßnahmen - eine Herausforderung an die Bundesrepublik Deutschland', 30 Vereinte Nationen (VN) (1982) 12.

23 See, e.g., Fisler-Damrosch, supra note 2, at 103.

24 There is, however, an obligation to enter into negotiations for such agreements, see Frowein, `Commentary on Art. 43', in B. Simma (ed.), supra note 16, paras. 9f.

25 If one regards these authorizations as a case of collective self-defence, Art. 51 does not create an obligation to participate in the defence efforts.

Previous Page Table Of ContentsNext Page





Top of Page

© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law
All comments and suggestions should be sent to webmaster
This site is part of the Academy of European Law online, a joint partnership of the Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law and the Academy of European Law at the European University Institute.
This file was last modified: Monday, August 02, 1999 02:29PM