![]()
|
Book ReviewsPatrick Thornberry, International Law and the Rights of Minorities,
Oxford, Clare Press (1991) 411 p. + Annexes + Index Nowadays the world community faces not only the question of how to
ensure democratic majority rule, but also the growing problem of guaranteeing
respect for the rights of various underprivileged minority groups. It is hardly
disputable that the problem of 'national', 'racial', 'ethnic', 'religious' and
'linguistic' minorities all over the world constitutes currently one of the
most burning issues on the international human rights agenda. The development
of modern human rights philosophy occurred in such a way that it passed over to
a large extent from the ideas of simple majority rule and political rights for
all to taking into consideration the interests of those who are distinct in
some respect from the majority and, being therefore in a minority, find it
difficult for themselves to make the bodies of power consider their special
position and interests. What is a 'minority' in legal terms? Should it be regarded as a
collective entity or simply as a sum of individuals possessing certain
characteristics'? To what extent are minorities protected by modern
international law? What specific rights, if any, must be granted to minorities
in order to improve their situation? Is the idea of 'special treatment' of
minorities compatible with the principles of equality and non-discrimination?
These are only some of the questions posed by the problem considered. The
author of International Law and the Rights of Minorities shows good
insight into these matters, and enables the reader to obtain a systematized
view of them. P. Thornberry's book is an in-depth study of modern international law
applicable to minorities. The author also briefly discusses the usual
theoretical problems connected with the minority matter. In the introduction Thornberry outlines the differences between the
notions 'assimilation', 'integration', 'fusion' and 'segregation'. He supports
the already traditional definition of the minority formulated by
Capotorti,1 according to which a minority is
a group numerically inferior to the rest of the population, in a non-dominant
position, consisting of nationals of the State, possessing distinct ethnic,
religious or linguistic characteristics and showing a sense of solidarity aimed
at preserving those characteristics.2 The
question of minority definition is further addressed in connection with Article
27 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.3 He deals with the problem of whether the right to
self-determination is applicable to minorities and shows that these two matters
from the point of view of positive international law are in no way
interconnected. The author argues that rights which may be attributable to
minorities (or 'persons belonging to minorities'), as well as any other type of
human rights, can be either 'individual' or 'collective', or both. He does not
elaborate, however, on how these types of rights can be distinguished.
Thomberry supports Dinstein in his view that two rights can be deduced from
international law which pertain to minorities as collectivities: the right to
physical existence (prohibition of genocide), and the right to preservation of
a separate identity (Article 27 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights).
According to Thornberry, however. the latter is not truly a collective right
under modern international law, but represents a compromise between group
rights and individual rights. These two rights, as well as the individual right
not to be discriminated against, form the basis on which the author analyses
the corresponding international law provisions. The structure of the book reflects both the history of the problem as
well as the author's analytical approach.4
Part I describes the historical background and the League of Nations' system of
minority protection, Part II concerns the right of minorities to existence. The
author in particular gives an extensive account of the history of genocide
prohibition. He reviews in detail the substantive law of the Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, its implementation
mechanism and the contents of the corresponding customary law. The author
provides evidence that prohibition of genocide constitutes part of customary
international law and jus cogens. In Part III ('Identity and Non-Discrimination') the post-World War II
shift from protecting the identity of minorities to ensuring individual rights
for all is reviewed in the light of the history of the United Nations Charter,
the post-World War I Peace Treaties, the United Nations Sub-Commission on
Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities and the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights. The chapter on the right to identity (Part IV) is largely a detailed
review of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and its 'minority' Article
27. The practice of the Human Rights Committee is referred to, as well as the
work of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe. Thornberry
supports the view according to which, notwithstanding the travaux
préparatoires support a restrictive interpretation of Article 27,
this provision should be construed in a broad way. Such a conclusion is based
both on a logical interpretation of the Article (according to which 'unless
Article 27 is given a more forceful content, it adds nothing to the Covenant'
(p. 180)) and the link of Article 27 with the provisions of the Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which give Article 27 'a programmatic
element, a goal to be achieved' (p. 181). Therefore, according to Thornberry,
Article 27 imposes on States Parties an obligation to 'take such measures as
are necessary in order to assist the minority to preserve its values' (p. 186).
The author also categorically argues that another implication of the Article is
freedom from interference by States with 'whatever action a minority takes on
its own initiative' to preserve its culture (p.185). This statement, however,
is not supported by compelling evidence, and one could doubt whether
governments would easily agree with this view. It should also be noted that no
clear distinction is made in the book in terms of special minority rights
between these two types of minority protection: 'negative' and 'positive. Analysing the question of the extent to which human rights standards
constitute customary international law, Thornberry notes that, despite certain
connections between Article 27 and universally recognized human rights, it is
only 'secured by treaty rather than by customary law' (p. 392). Part V, in which the right of minority members to non-discrimination is
considered, contains an account of the relevant provisions in the United
Nations instruments on non-discrimination, the Covenants on Human Rights, the
European Convention on Human Rights, as well as references to this principle in
the South-West Africa Cases and the Advisory Opinion on Namibia. In particular,
Thornberry addresses the question of whether from the point of view of
international law 'affirmative action' or 'special measures' for the benefit of
disadvantaged groups are compatible with the prohibition of discrimination or
'distinction', and replies in the affirmative. The author also quite
convincingly argues that non-discrimination on the grounds of language and
religion should not be considered as having weaker status than
non-discrimination on the grounds of race. The corollary made by Thornberry
with regard to freedom from discrimination of minority members on the grounds
of race, religion or language is that it is 'probably reflected in customary
international law' (p. 394) and, less probably, in jus
cogens. In Part VI the author deals with the
relatively independent problem of 'indigenous peoples 7 He rightly mentions
that 'there is clearly an overlap between the general case of minorities and
the specific issue of indigenous groups' p. 33 1). 'Indigenous rights' are a
broader concept than I minority rights', for they also concern, among others,
such issues as land rights and selfdetermination. Nonetheless, indigenous
peoples are generally viewed as beneficiaries of the I minority rights' as
well, in particular by the Human Rights Committee in its application of Article
27 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. An interesting point which Thomberry discusses in his book, in
particular in connection with the Declaration and the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, the practice of the
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and the question of
indigenous peoples, is about the relationship between the concepts of
'integration' and I assimilation'. The author shows that States tend to use the
pretext of 'integration' to justify what in reality constitutes outlawed
'artificial assimilation'. Part VII contains conclusions and recommendations de lege lata
and de lege ferenda. In terms of lex ferenda the author is
skeptical whether any progress can soon be achieved in respect of minority
protection on the universal level, but is more optimistic as far as Europe is
concerned. He is keen on securing States' willingness to move in this direction
by 'very explicitly' safeguarding their territorial integrity in any eventual
new instruments on minorities. Despite the fact that the book is mostly focused
on the analysis of existing international law rules, it is rightly stated that
'new, more specific instruments' are required to ensure effective protection
minorities (pp. 397-398). The book contains a number of appendixes (texts of
sort documents for minority protection), the criteria for the choice of which
are rather unclear. It also includes a useful bibliography and an index. In general, International Law and the Rights of Minorities can be
recommended as a detailed, enlightening and comprehensive guide to the problem
of minority protection by means of international law. Maxim Smyslov European University Institute, Florence
|
|
|
© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law | ||