![]()
|
Book ReviewsPatricia Birnie, Alan Boyle, International Law and the Environment,
Oxford, Clarendon Press (1992) 563 pages, including Table of cases, Table
of major treaties and instruments, Index. Since its emergence in the late sixties, international law for the
protection of the environment has been a remarkable example of international
law-making, which is comparable to the success achieved in the field of human
rights. This book aims at assessing the current state of international law
concerning the protection of the natural environment. The basis and perspective
of international law in this field have considerably changed since the late
sixties. From a restricted set of principles of good neighbourliness and
resource-sharing applicable to litigation for transboundary pollution, a wide
range of rules has been developed to accommodate pollution prevention and
protection of the world's natural environment, including areas beyond the
jurisdiction of States. A number of topics have been scrutinized, where the authors concluded
that international law had made a major impact, ranging from pollution of the
sea and of international watercourses, the international control of hazardous
wastes and nuclear energy, to emerging issues of protection of the atmosphere
and conservation of living resources. Part I analyses general principles and customs applicable to
environmental issues, such as prompt notification, the principle of
causing no appreciable harm, the polluter pays principle, equal access to
natural resources, as well as traditional mechanisms of dispute settlement
which are widely accepted by State practice and jurisprudence. These principles
constitute sources of law, and are separated from statements, declarations and
guidelines elaborated by international bodies, which do not establish legal
obligations - even where included in treaties - but simply orientate the
States' behaviour. This body of principles forms part of the so-called
`soft-law', the binding force of which will eventually rest upon confirmation
by international practice. The authors rightly share the predominant approach
to international law-making which does not invest declarations and political
guidelines with inherent legal force. Nevertheless, these instruments evidence
an opinio iuris, thereby exercising some influence on States' conduct.
It might then be expected that the principles stated in the 1992 Rio
Declaration on Environment and Development, which gained widespread acceptance
in the Rio Conference, will be complied with by States in the future. Notwithstanding the wide consensus concerning the principles agreed at
Rio, it is pointed out that persistent conflicting political aims between
developed and developing countries remain a barrier to effective environmental
protection. Environmental protection and economic progress must both be
accommodated, and both groups of States must bear their responsibilities on the
grounds of fairness. In this context, United Nations specialized agencies and bodies, such as
UNEP regional commissions, as well as other international and regional
organizations (OECD, EEC, etc.) are recognized as having a central role in
promoting further international negotiations for the protection of the world's
natural environment. Part II is then devoted to detailing the rules that apply on the
international setting, including customary law and treaties regulating specific
areas, such as the marine environment and its living resources, endangered
migratory species, pollution of international watercourses, the atmosphere and
Outer Space, and control of international hazards. In particular, the chapters
on the international regulation of ultra-hazardous risks posed respectively by
nuclear activities and international trade in hazardous substances
and waste well illustrate the tension between environmental concerns on the
one hand, and the need to safeguard economic benefits on the other. A clear understanding of international law concerning environmental
protection is essential to its progress and to the removal of its major
limiting factors; these are the diffuse lack of enforcement and supervision,
and the inadequate protection of areas of common concern. The authors suggest
that scarce implementation by the States of international environmental law in
the past indicates a need to develop international institutions capable of
ensuring effective compliance and implementation of treaties. However, it
emerges that States have generally avoided resort to supranational institutions
of enforcement - although this does not mean that State sovereignty has
remained unaffected. In addition, the authors lament that national law is still
primarily responsible for the assessment of environmental damage and providing
redress to victims. They favour civil liability regimes over regimes of State
responsibility for environmental harm. The progressive involvement of
individuals and environmental groups in the enforcement of international law is
also encouraged, as well as the establishment, in the future, of an individual
right to a decent environment protected by international law. The book concludes by asserting that public international law provides a
framework to develop political and scientific cooperation, harmonize national
provisions, and to negotiate measures of economic assistance and realize
distributive equity. The experience of the Ozone Convention with its additional
protocols represents a pattern of some utility for future negotiations.
Moreover, recent experience has demonstrated that international regulation of
pollution, national sovereignty over natural resources and economic development
are closely interconnected. The major challenge of international law will then
consist of adequately addressing `... questions of economic development, the
interests of future generations, the provision of financial incentives,
technical assistance and technology transfer' with a view to encouraging fair
and wide participation of States, while guaranteeing effective protection of
the global environment. Francesca Pestellini European University Institute, Florence
|
|
|
© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law | ||