![]()
|
Book ReviewsGardner, J.P. (ed.), Aspects Of Incorporation of the European
Convention of Human Rights into Domestic Law, London: The British Institute
of International and Comparative Law/The British Institute of Human Rights
(1993) xxi+ 119pages. £15. Hillgruber, Christian, and Matthias Jestaedt, The European Convention
on Human Rights and the Protection of National Minorities, Köln:
Verlag Wissenschaft und Politik (1994) 124 pages. DM 28. When dealing with issues of human rights protection in Europe, the
European Convention on Human Rights must be considered the major instrument.
Accordingly the two books to be reviewed, especially since they deal with some
of the most interesting issues of the ECHR, are of interest for everybody who
works in the field. The first work is the result of a conference held at the British
Institute of International and Comparative Law in 1991. It comprises nine
articles on the requirements of the Convention as to its own incorporation, on
some national approaches to incorporation of the Convention and finally some
articles on the Convention's place in the law of the United Kingdom. In his
report J.A. Frowein argues in favour of an obligation of incorporation to be
eventually derived from the Convention before then describing in some detail
the effects the Convention has had in the municipal law of the Federal Republic
of Germany despite the fact that the German constitution itself contains an
elaborate catalogue of human rights which largely parallels the guarantees of
the Convention. The report by H. Krüger questions, whether the fact that a
state has incorporated the convention has some real world effects on being
found to have violated the convention. His report reveals the somewhat
surprising fact that there are no major differences in this regard, which could
be based on the fact of incorporation or non- incorporation. He argues,
however, that those states which have incorporated the Convention might be more
swiftly able to react to decisions of the Convention organs. Chapter III contains two national reports on the status of the
Convention in both Norway and Denmark. It also describes draft legislation to
incorporate the Convention into the domestic law of the United Kingdom. It is
regrettable that none of the new democracies of Eastern Europe which have
become parties to the Convention since the beginning of the nineties are dealt
with in a national report, even more since the languages of most of them are
only accessible to very few readers. Furthermore it has to be noted that
despite the fact that the convention was incorporated in Denmark already as of
April 1992 and that the book to be reviewed was published in 1993, this
fact is only very briefly mentioned in a footnote although this example could
serve as a very valuable model for other jurisdictions. (For a more detailed
analysis the reader may turn to Hofmann's piece in EuGRZ ( 1992)
253). A rather interesting article is the one written by R. Blackburn. He
describes a bill which was introduced in the British House of Commons, the goal
of which was to incorporate the Convention into the British legal system. It
would have been helpful, however to reprint the text of the proposed bill in an
annex even more since the bill only contains nine sections. The last four
articles, which are all somewhat specific, deal with various aspects of the
effects the Convention has had in the United Kingdom. The most rewarding one is
the last piece dealing with the compliance of the United Kingdom with findings
of the Committee of Ministers and judgements of the Court, which in particular
contains a very helpful survey of decisions and respective British
reactions. On the whole, the book does not give an exhaustive overview over the
issue of incorporation but instead is really limited as already indicated by
its title - to some aspects of the problem. It largely focusses on the British
perspective. Therefore it might be particularly useful for those readers who
want to inform themselves about the British practice in the field. The European Convention on Human Rights was drafted at a time when the
issue of minorities seemed to have lost much of the importance it had
previously gained after World War 1. By now, however, and as demonstrated by
recent developments in Eastern Europe, these questions have regained major
legal and political importance. Since there is still no legally binding
instrument on either the universal or regional level which deals with the
protection of minorities, analyzing the ECHR as to whether it can be used as a
too] to protect ethnic minorities is rewarding. The two authors, after having first described the drafting history of
the Convention outline the jurisprudence of the Convention organs and consider
to what extent it deals with minority issues. In that regard the booklet gives
an accurate and up-to-date description of the jurisprudence under the
Convention and the guarantees which can be of relevance for members of national
minorities (ranging from Articles. 8, 9, 10, 11, 14 to Article 3 of the First
Additional Protocol). It lacks, however, somewhat of a perspective when
describing the current efforts within the Council of Europe to improve the
system of the protection of minorities. In particular the authors should have
updated the original manuscript when preparing it for translation and should
have taken into consideration the Vienna Summit Document of October 1993.
Another shortfall might be the fact that the very question what constitutes a
minority, which is one of the most important and intrinsic problems as far as
the protection of minorities is concerned, is only dealt with on two pages (p.
87-88), which is insufficient to deal with the different aspects of the
problem. On the whole, it might be said, that while the work is quite useful in
order to gain a first insight into the relationship between the ECHR and the
protection of minorities, it does not cover all various aspects of what is
still one of the most challenging political issues in Europe. Andreas Zimmermann Max Planck Institute for International and Comparative Public Law,
Heidelberg
|
|
|
© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law | ||