![]()
|
Book ReviewsO'Flaherty, Michael, and Liz Heffernan. International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights: International Human Rights Law in Ireland.
Dublin: Brehon Publishing, 1995. Pp. xxvii, 206. Index. Ireland ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights in 1989. Since the state's inception, its external political profile has
been characterized by a rhetorical commitment to rights protection and an
activist position on human rights concerns in its membership of international
and regional human rights organizations. External rhetoric stood in marked
contrast to internal constitutional arrangements, whose effect was to stymie
the rights of minorities, rigidify a relationship between church and state and
suppress due process rights under the cloak of a permanent emergency.
O'Flaherty and Heffernan's book comes at a critical juncture, where it is
possible to evaluate whether Ireland's ratification of the Covenant is merely a
means of receiving easy accolades for an empty gesture, or the product of
genuine self-analysis and internationalization. The book offers a useful insight into the process whereby Ireland has
moved towards integrating itself more centrally into the international human
rights community. However, it lacks systematic treatment of the unique problems
that have undermined rights protection in the Irish jurisdiction, with scant
historical or political analysis within which to contextualize the state
position. Chapter 1 engages in a succinct and informative introduction to the
Covenant and its implementation mechanisms. Chapter 2 is central to the project
of the book, outlining both the structure of legal protection for human rights
in Ireland and the compatibility of the legal order with the rights enumerated
in the Covenant. While the authors identify the rights protected by the Irish
Constitution, they do not elucidate upon the many rights-based controversies
that have dogged the unique conception of rights related to family life,
marriage, education, the status of the Catholic Church, limitations upon
freedom of expression and the right to jury trial in the jurisdiction. What makes the Irish experience unique to many observers is the
negotiation inherent in a tradition-based society with formal godly-based
values, coming to terms with a culture of non-discrimination and formal
equality. The lack of this dimension means that the analysis loses depth and
fails to reflect upon the singularity of the Irish rights experience. While Chapter 2 acknowledges that the Irish Constitution allows for
derogation from constitutional protection of rights, the consequences for Irish
legal culture of a 55-year permanent emergency is not explored. One of the
difficulties in evaluating the use of emergency powers in the Irish Republic
has been the use of the ordinary criminal process of the state to absorb and
normalize draconian measures designed to limit the exercise of individual
rights. Thus, meaningful ratification of the Covenant would require a root and
branch examination of the state's legal structure to ensure that substance and
not showmanship is the end sought by endorsement of the Covenant. The book offers a welcome insight into Ireland's first reporting
exercise to the Human Rights Committee. For the uninitiated, detailed accounts
of the workings of the Optional Protocol and its comparative European
Convention mechanisms are provided. The information will be of particular
relevance to NGOs and those actively engaged in the human rights field in
Ireland. Overall, the book provides a useful snapshot of an Irish embrace of
the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Its failure to provide a more
comprehensive critique of the rights debate in the jurisdiction is its primary
limitation, allowing no insight into the long-term reception that absorption of
the Covenant may have on domestic law and policy. Dr. Fionnuala Ni Aolain Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs
|
|
|
© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law | ||