Home
Current Issue
Developments
Archive
Table of Contents
Surveys
Book Reviews
Discussion Forum
Information
Reading Room
Links of Interest
Search
Join our email list
Translate this page
  

Decisions of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization

TRIPS: India - Patent Protection for Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Chemical Products Introduction


Complete Text of this Survey (RTF Format)

Full text of the WTO Appellate Body Report (PDF Format) *

Previous PageTable of ContentsNext Page

Eric Brown**

WTO Appellate Body Report, TRIPS: India - Patent Protection for Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Chemical Products, AB-1997-5, 16 January 1998, Adopted by Dispute Settlement Body, India, Appellant; United States, Appellee; European Communities; Third Participant, Division: Lacarte-Muró, Bacchus and Beeby.

Introduction

The dispute that reached the WTO Appellate Body in this case arises from complaints by American companies that India failed to meet its obligations under the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) to provide appropriate patent protection (or, more precisely, to pave the way for eventual patent protection) for pharmaceutical and agricultural chemical products. This decision is important to the trade community as it embodies the first dispute resolution centering around TRIPS. TRIPS and the intellectual property rights it protects have become an integral part of cross-border trade of goods and services. The findings issued by the Appellate Body in this case lay an important foundation for future treatment and interpretation of TRIPS. In addition, the Appellate Body's treatment of this case is of great interest to international lawyers beyond the realm of trade because the decision sheds light on aspects of public international law including the role expectations play in the interpretation of treaties under Article 31 of the Vienna Convention, the meaning of "good faith interpretation" under Article 31, the power of a dispute resolution body to hear claims that are brought before it, and the ability of a "foreign" tribunal to examine a country's laws.


Top Of Page* provided by worldtradelaw.net

Top Of Page** JD candidate, Harvard Law School.


Previous PageTable of ContentsNext Page





Top of Page

© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law
All comments and suggestions should be sent to webmaster
This site is part of the Academy of European Law online, a joint partnership of the Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law and the Academy of European Law at the European University Institute.
This file was last modified: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 12:47PM