![]()
|
The `International Community': Facing the Challenge of Globalization4 ConclusionTo sum up, the world of the famous `Lotus principle', according to which states are only bound by their express consent, seems to be gradually giving way to a more communitarian, more highly institutionalized international law, in which states `channel' the pursuit of most of their individual interests through multilateral institutions. Even if private actors, whether groups or individuals, have not yet become regular subjects of general international law, the system as a whole increasingly permeates state boundaries for the sake of protection of individual and group rights. Therefore, we suggest adopting a `Grotian' view, but to mix it, as it were, with elements of both `Vattelianism' and `Kantianism', and with an increasing pull towards institutionalization. In any case, the concept of an `international community' contains as much aspiration as reality. To quote the former President of the International Court of Justice, Mohammed Bedjaoui, in his Declaration to the 1996 Advisory Opinion on Nuclear Weapons,42 an opinion which perfectly demonstrates the contradictory elements inherent in contemporary international society: 43 Despite the still modest breakthrough of `supra-nationalism', the progress made in terms of the institutionalization, not to say integration and `globalization', of international society is undeniable.... The resolutely positivist, voluntarist approach of international law still current at the beginning of the century ... has been replaced by an objective conception of international law, a law more readily seeking to reflect a collective juridical conscience and respond to the social necessities of States organized as a community.
|
|
|
© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law | ||