![]()
|
Book ReviewsTuttle, William M, Jr. `Daddy's Gone to War': The Second World War in
the Lives of America's Children. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press,
1995. During the 1996 American presidential campaign, much was made of the
fact that Senator Robert Dole, the Republican candidate for President, was
almost certainly the last veteran of the Second World War who would stand for
the presidency. Although Dole's candidacy symbolized the closing of a 50-year
era in politics dominated by men who had served in the War, it does not mark
the end of the Second World War as a significant personal event in the lives of
political and foreign policy elites. In an interesting and thoroughly
entertaining piece of interdisciplinary research, William Tuttle demonstrates
that Americans who were born or came of age during the Second World War were as
profoundly affected by the experience as those in military service. Now aged
55-65 and entering the last years of their working lives, these `homefront
children' will remain a dominant force in American political and foreign policy
decision-making for the next decade. In Daddy's Gone to War, Professor
Tuttle gives this uniquely situated demographic cadre a thorough psychological
and historical scrubbing. In the introduction to Daddy's Gone to War, Professor Tuttle (a
`homefront child' himself whose father served for three years as a combat
thoracic surgeon in North Africa and Europe) describes how this project
developed over 25 years. Although a history professor, he dedicated three
separate years of concentrated study at Kansas, Stanford and Berkeley to
developmental psychology. However, the author admits that after these three
years of intensive study and several more years of research, his resulting
600-page history of America's homefront children was `one-dimensional and
boring'. To salvage the work, Professor Tuttle wrote to the editors of 100
newspapers, requesting assistance in soliciting reminiscences from readers who
were homefront children. When joined with the author's thorough skills as a
historian and his later-acquired knowledge of child psychology, the 2,500
responses he received have yielded an insightful and useful cross-disciplinary
study. It is the personal stories of these now-ageing homefront children -
albeit unscientifically collected (and the author admits as much) - that
broadens the appeal of this work from the narrow world of social historians to
a much wider audience of informed readers. Beginning with the fear and confusion engendered in children by the
profound emotional impact of Pearl Harbour, the author paints with a broad
brush for the succeeding 14 chapters, ranging over subjects as diverse as
departing fathers, changing households, nutrition and health, war worker
mothers, Saturday matinee newsreels, comic books and homecoming reunions.
Interesting as these topics are, particularly for those of us who are the
children of homefront children, the book's broader appeal stems from Professor
Tuttle's facility in weaving his descriptive narrative of child psychological
development into the vast social and political changes overtaking a major
industrial nation at war. The author neatly ties the micro-effects of war and
mobilization on a child's individual development - and the personal
reminiscences poignantly underscore this - to such profound changes in American
society as the dilution of ethnic self-identification, the acceptance of
state-sponsored child care, the conversion of America from a rural to an urban
nation, or the undermining of traditional gender roles. Although sometimes
breathtaking in his sweep, the author carries us with him as he draws his
convincing and compelling connections. Because of the author's ambitious
vision, there is much here for anyone interested in present-day American
politics, foreign policy, culture or society. The work is not without minor faults. Not surprisingly, Professor Tuttle
is most sure of himself when writing social history, and this shows through in
his narrative. He occasionally adopts a rather remedial tone when discussing
developmental psychology, as if needing to reassure himself and his readers
that he really does understand the subject. This is more distracting than
helpful. Additionally, the narrative is sometimes jerky, revealing what are
apparently the points of the editor's excisions. Since the author managed twice
the number of pages before adding the distillation of 2,500 personal memoirs,
one suspects that Daddy's Gone to War's resulting 260 pages of text were
the result of some brutal red-pencilling. Unfortunately, in some subject areas
like gender or race, we are left a little unsatisfied with our certain
knowledge that Professor Tuttle has much more of interest to say on these
matters. Coupled with some remarkably unappealing and unrevealing cover notes,
one is left expecting better from Oxford University Press. Although not a `must-read' for anyone other than twentieth-century
American social historians and childhood psychologists, Professor Tuttle has
offered up a truly useful work that can provide an invaluable context for
anyone interested in American foreign policy-making and politics in the 1980s,
1990s, and beyond. Additionally, we are given a brief but well-crafted overview
of some pioneering work by a skilled historian. Particularly in the areas of
ethnic identification and political socialization, one hopes that the author
will produce other similar books. Jeffrey K. Walker Harvard Law School
|
|
|
© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law | ||