Home
Current Issue
Developments
Archive
Table of Contents
Surveys
Book Reviews
Discussion Forum
Information
Reading Room
Links of Interest
Search
Join our email list
Translate this page
  

Decisions of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization
Argentina--Measures Affecting Imports of Footwear, Textiles, Apparel and Other Items

Previous PageTable of ContentsNext Page

2. Facts

This case arises from allegations by the U.S. that Argentina charged tariffs in excess of its bound rates with respect to certain footwear, textiles, apparel and other items, including specific duties as well as a "statistical tax" of 3% ad valorem. The U.S. claimed that these measures were inconsistent with the obligations of Argentina under articles II, VII, VIII and X of GATT 1994, as well as articles 1 through 8 of the agreement on Implementation of Article VII of GATT 1994 and article 7 of the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing ("ATC").

In the Uruguay Round, Argentina had accepted a bound rate of 35% ad valorem with respect to these items. In addition, Argentina had a system of minimum specific import duties in respect of textiles, clothing and footwear, as well as the statistical tax mentioned above. The minimum specific import duties had some limited similarity to the "American Selling Price" system formerly used by the U.S.: it was designed to increase duties where imported goods are sold at prices below cost or below "international prices." The minimum specific import duties often raised the actual duty charged above the 35% bound rate. Argentina's bindings did not mention these duties. The statistical tax was designed to finance the collection by the Argentine customs service of statistical information relating to imports and exports. The statistical tax was included in Argentina's bindings.1


Top Of Page1 Argentina--Measures Affecting Imports of Footwear, Textiles, Apparel and Other Items, WT/DS56/R (97-5138), 25 November 1997 [hereinafter, "Panel Report"]. The Panelists were Peter Pale_ka, Heather Forton and Peter May.

Previous PageTable of ContentsNext Page





Top of Page

© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law
All comments and suggestions should be sent to webmaster
This site is part of the Academy of European Law online, a joint partnership of the Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law and the Academy of European Law at the European University Institute.
This file was last modified: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 12:54PM