Home
Current Issue
Developments
Archive
Table of Contents
Surveys
Book Reviews
Discussion Forum
Information
Reading Room
Links of Interest
Search
Join our email list
Translate this page
  

Decisions of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization

United States-Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Certain Hot-Rolled Lead and Bismuth Carbon Steel Products Originating in the United Kingdom

Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page

2. Facts

This complaint was brought with respect to countervailing duties assessed by the US against certain hot-rolled and bismuth carbon steel products (`leaded bars') from the UK. The alleged subsidies were comprised of equity infusions from the UK government to British Steel Corporation, a state-owned company, between 1977 and 1986. In 1986, BSC transferred the assets that produced leaded bars to a joint venture company in arm's length negotiations, and in return for an equity share in the joint venture. In 1988, the successor to BSC, British Steel plc, was privatized through a sale of shares to the public. The US Department of Commerce held that the sale of shares in this privatization was arm's length, for fair market value and consistent with commercial considerations.

The US originally imposed the countervailing duties in 1993. The UK claims relate to countervailing duties applied in 1995, 1996 and 1997. The US imposed countervailing duties on the basis that a certain proportion of the subsidies granted to BSC had passed through to the joint venture and to BSC's successor.

Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page





Top of Page

© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law
All comments and suggestions should be sent to webmaster
This site is part of the Academy of European Law online, a joint partnership of the Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law and the Academy of European Law at the European University Institute.
This file was last modified: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 11:48AM